Aim & Scope
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate. [1]
2024 - VOLUME 32
Chimú ceramic featuring a wolf, at the crossroads of iconodiagnosis and semantic shifts
No authors listed.
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health , 2024 - VOLUME 32 , p 100945.
A little trip for the camera, a big step backwards for humanism: Paleo-anthropology and bioethics
No authors listed.
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health , 2024 - VOLUME 32 , p 100959.
Health emergency in Haiti after Covid-19: Live or survive?
No authors listed.
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health , 2024 - VOLUME 32 , p 100960.
Truth, perspectivism, and scientific knowledge on health
No authors listed.
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health , 2024 - VOLUME 32 , p 100964.
End of life in France: Change the law or change mentalities?
No authors listed.
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health , 2024 - VOLUME 32 , p 100965.
Policies to address the Covid-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from tribal policymakers
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health , 2024 - VOLUME 32 , p 100971.
Editorial Retractions, Expressions of Concern and External Notices
No authors listed.
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
2024 - VOLUME 32
0 11
PubPeer
2023 - VOLUME 2023, ISSUE 5
0 0
